https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351879 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the lower authorities, dismissing the appeal due to the appellant's failure to comply with the provisions of Rule 21 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, by not filing the necessary application for remission of duty on destroyed packing material. The judgment emphasized that duty liability must be fulfilled unless the conditions for remission are met through a formal application, clarifying the procedural requirements for remission of duty. en-us Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Dec 2017 08:12:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351879 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the lower authorities, dismissing the appeal due to the appellant's failure to comply with the provisions of Rule 21 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, by not filing the necessary application for remission of duty on destroyed packing material. The judgment emphasized that duty liability must be fulfilled unless the conditions for remission are met through a formal application, clarifying the procedural requirements for remission of duty. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351879