https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351878 The Tribunal upheld the demand for duty, dismissing the appellant's appeals. It ruled that the appellant, who had opted for an exemption under notification No.9/2001-CE, could not simultaneously avail of another exemption under notification No.8/2001-CE. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to the conditions of excise duty notifications and clarified that the appellant's entitlement to a specific exemption was restricted by a prior choice made under a different notification. en-us Mon, 30 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Dec 2017 08:12:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351878 The Tribunal upheld the demand for duty, dismissing the appellant's appeals. It ruled that the appellant, who had opted for an exemption under notification No.9/2001-CE, could not simultaneously avail of another exemption under notification No.8/2001-CE. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to the conditions of excise duty notifications and clarified that the appellant's entitlement to a specific exemption was restricted by a prior choice made under a different notification. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 30 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351878