<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 146 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351877</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders and ruling in favor of the appellants. The judge held that Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules does not apply to waste or by-products generated during the manufacturing process, citing various judgments and the clarification in the CBEC Circular allowing cenvat credit for inputs in waste. The decision was based on precedents and concluded that Rule 6(3) does not mandate the reversal of credit for waste or by-products.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 08:12:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 146 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351877</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders and ruling in favor of the appellants. The judge held that Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules does not apply to waste or by-products generated during the manufacturing process, citing various judgments and the clarification in the CBEC Circular allowing cenvat credit for inputs in waste. The decision was based on precedents and concluded that Rule 6(3) does not mandate the reversal of credit for waste or by-products.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>