<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 137 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351868</link>
    <description>Adequate manufacturing infrastructure, including machinery records, later verification, a chartered engineer&#039;s certificate, audit documents, ISO certification and filed declarations, supported the claim that the exported goods were manufactured in the appellants&#039; factory. The Revenue&#039;s allegation that they lacked manufacturing capability was not backed by crucial evidence of procurement of finished goods from elsewhere or diversion of inputs. On that record, the benefit of doubt favoured the appellants, so denial of Cenvat credit was unsustainable and the rebate already sanctioned was not recoverable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2017 13:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 137 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351868</link>
      <description>Adequate manufacturing infrastructure, including machinery records, later verification, a chartered engineer&#039;s certificate, audit documents, ISO certification and filed declarations, supported the claim that the exported goods were manufactured in the appellants&#039; factory. The Revenue&#039;s allegation that they lacked manufacturing capability was not backed by crucial evidence of procurement of finished goods from elsewhere or diversion of inputs. On that record, the benefit of doubt favoured the appellants, so denial of Cenvat credit was unsustainable and the rebate already sanctioned was not recoverable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>