<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1140 - CESTAT, JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196496</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Jaipur allowed the appeal by M/s Mangalam Cement, represented by Advocate Ms. Rinky Arora, against the disallowance of Cenvat credit for input services including auction service, insurance service, outdoor catering service, rent a cab service, and outward transportation. The Tribunal held that all the services were eligible for Cenvat credit under Rule 3(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, emphasizing that auction service was related to business activities. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s argument on Central Excise duty payment for outward transportation, granting relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2017 10:01:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1140 - CESTAT, JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196496</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Jaipur allowed the appeal by M/s Mangalam Cement, represented by Advocate Ms. Rinky Arora, against the disallowance of Cenvat credit for input services including auction service, insurance service, outdoor catering service, rent a cab service, and outward transportation. The Tribunal held that all the services were eligible for Cenvat credit under Rule 3(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, emphasizing that auction service was related to business activities. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s argument on Central Excise duty payment for outward transportation, granting relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>