https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196509 The Supreme Court clarified in a case involving a dismissed Assistant Teacher that impleading the tribunal is not necessary in Special Civil Applications under Articles 226 and 227, as long as the tribunal is not required to defend its own order. The Court emphasized that tribunals are necessary parties only when they need to defend their decisions. The case was remanded to the High Court for further proceedings on the merits, with a directive for expeditious handling due to the prolonged disciplinary process. All substantive issues were left open for the High Court's decision. en-us Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 03 Dec 2017 10:01:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196509 The Supreme Court clarified in a case involving a dismissed Assistant Teacher that impleading the tribunal is not necessary in Special Civil Applications under Articles 226 and 227, as long as the tribunal is not required to defend its own order. The Court emphasized that tribunals are necessary parties only when they need to defend their decisions. The case was remanded to the High Court for further proceedings on the merits, with a directive for expeditious handling due to the prolonged disciplinary process. All substantive issues were left open for the High Court's decision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196509