<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1306 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196509</link>
    <description>In judicial review under Articles 226 and 227, a tribunal is not a necessary party where the real lis is between the management and the aggrieved employee and the tribunal is not legally required to defend its order. Because non-impleadment of such a tribunal does not make the writ petition non-maintainable, the earlier dismissal of the Letters Patent Appeal on that ground was incorrect. The tribunal under the Gujarat Secondary Education Act functions as both an original and appellate forum, but that role does not by itself require impleadment in writ proceedings. The dismissal for want of maintainability was set aside and the matter restored for decision on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2017 10:01:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1306 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196509</link>
      <description>In judicial review under Articles 226 and 227, a tribunal is not a necessary party where the real lis is between the management and the aggrieved employee and the tribunal is not legally required to defend its order. Because non-impleadment of such a tribunal does not make the writ petition non-maintainable, the earlier dismissal of the Letters Patent Appeal on that ground was incorrect. The tribunal under the Gujarat Secondary Education Act functions as both an original and appellate forum, but that role does not by itself require impleadment in writ proceedings. The dismissal for want of maintainability was set aside and the matter restored for decision on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>