https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196488 The High Court dismissed the defendant's appeal against the order setting aside a compromise decree in a property dispute. The Court found the compromise agreement invalid as it sought to transfer property without a registered instrument, violating the Transfer of Property Act. It held that the trial court erred in basing its decision on the unlawful compromise. The Court also clarified that challenges to compromise petitions can be raised through applications or appeals under Section 96(1) C.P.C., affirming the lower court's decision to remand the matter for fresh consideration. en-us Wed, 20 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Dec 2017 16:51:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196488 The High Court dismissed the defendant's appeal against the order setting aside a compromise decree in a property dispute. The Court found the compromise agreement invalid as it sought to transfer property without a registered instrument, violating the Transfer of Property Act. It held that the trial court erred in basing its decision on the unlawful compromise. The Court also clarified that challenges to compromise petitions can be raised through applications or appeals under Section 96(1) C.P.C., affirming the lower court's decision to remand the matter for fresh consideration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196488