<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1137 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196486</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to reconsider the addition based on Form 26AS and deleting the disallowance of EPF and ESI contributions. The tribunal emphasized the need for proper reconciliation and verification of the appellant&#039;s claims, noting that income was recorded based on actual receipts fully disclosed to the department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1137 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196486</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to reconsider the addition based on Form 26AS and deleting the disallowance of EPF and ESI contributions. The tribunal emphasized the need for proper reconciliation and verification of the appellant&#039;s claims, noting that income was recorded based on actual receipts fully disclosed to the department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>