<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 935 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196485</link>
    <description>Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act bars establishment of rights under an unprobated will but does not prevent an executor or legatee from pleading those rights or seeking interim protection for an estate at risk. Section 211 recognises the executor as the deceased&#039;s representative, with probate perfecting rather than creating that position. Registration of a conveyance evidences execution but does not conclusively establish substantive validity. Sections 32 and 33 of the Registration Act do not require an attorney&#039;s authorising power of attorney to be registered solely because the attorney executed a conveyance for the principal; objections concerning the place of registration likewise did not establish invalidity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2017 14:44:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 935 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196485</link>
      <description>Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act bars establishment of rights under an unprobated will but does not prevent an executor or legatee from pleading those rights or seeking interim protection for an estate at risk. Section 211 recognises the executor as the deceased&#039;s representative, with probate perfecting rather than creating that position. Registration of a conveyance evidences execution but does not conclusively establish substantive validity. Sections 32 and 33 of the Registration Act do not require an attorney&#039;s authorising power of attorney to be registered solely because the attorney executed a conveyance for the principal; objections concerning the place of registration likewise did not establish invalidity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>