<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 935 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196485</link>
    <description>Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act bars proof of a right under an unprobated will, but the note states that it does not prevent an executor or legatee from pleading that right in a suit or seeking interim protection where the estate is under threat. It also explains that probate perfects the executor&#039;s position rather than creating it. On the conveyance issue, the note says a document executed by an attorney is not invalid merely because the underlying power of attorney was not itself registered, where the Registration Act&#039;s requirements for presentation and execution are otherwise satisfied. It adds that the objections raised did not undermine title at the interlocutory stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2017 14:44:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 935 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196485</link>
      <description>Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act bars proof of a right under an unprobated will, but the note states that it does not prevent an executor or legatee from pleading that right in a suit or seeking interim protection where the estate is under threat. It also explains that probate perfects the executor&#039;s position rather than creating it. On the conveyance issue, the note says a document executed by an attorney is not invalid merely because the underlying power of attorney was not itself registered, where the Registration Act&#039;s requirements for presentation and execution are otherwise satisfied. It adds that the objections raised did not undermine title at the interlocutory stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>