<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 732 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196484</link>
    <description>The High Court clarified that withdrawal of a suit without liberty to file a fresh suit does not preclude parties from raising defenses in subsequent litigation. The plaintiff&#039;s ownership claim and possession rights over the suit properties were upheld, with the court addressing procedural aspects of withdrawal without liberty to file a fresh suit. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, emphasizing that withdrawal without liberty does not bar defendants from raising relevant defenses in subsequent proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2017 12:52:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 732 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196484</link>
      <description>The High Court clarified that withdrawal of a suit without liberty to file a fresh suit does not preclude parties from raising defenses in subsequent litigation. The plaintiff&#039;s ownership claim and possession rights over the suit properties were upheld, with the court addressing procedural aspects of withdrawal without liberty to file a fresh suit. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, emphasizing that withdrawal without liberty does not bar defendants from raising relevant defenses in subsequent proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>