<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 132 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351863</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2010-11 based on accommodation entries from specific companies. The Assessing Officer had sufficient material and specific reasons to believe that income had escaped, justifying the initiation of reassessment. While the court acknowledged the petitioner&#039;s objections, it found the jurisdiction was validly exercised due to the detailed information provided. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to defend against the allegations during the reassessment process. The writ petition was dismissed, focusing on the jurisdictional aspect of reassessment initiation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2017 10:11:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 132 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351863</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2010-11 based on accommodation entries from specific companies. The Assessing Officer had sufficient material and specific reasons to believe that income had escaped, justifying the initiation of reassessment. While the court acknowledged the petitioner&#039;s objections, it found the jurisdiction was validly exercised due to the detailed information provided. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to defend against the allegations during the reassessment process. The writ petition was dismissed, focusing on the jurisdictional aspect of reassessment initiation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>