<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 124 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351855</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order on the transfer pricing adjustment issue and remitted the matter for a fresh determination. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the assessee granted a reasonable opportunity to be heard in the fresh proceedings. The exclusions of the companies by the DRP based on the Wages to sale ratio filter were upheld unless specific expenses were properly accounted for, leading to the inclusion of one company in the list of comparables.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2017 10:11:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 124 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351855</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order on the transfer pricing adjustment issue and remitted the matter for a fresh determination. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the assessee granted a reasonable opportunity to be heard in the fresh proceedings. The exclusions of the companies by the DRP based on the Wages to sale ratio filter were upheld unless specific expenses were properly accounted for, leading to the inclusion of one company in the list of comparables.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>