<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 114 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351845</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2012-13, as the disallowance of interest expenditure proportionate to exempted income under section 14A of the I.T. Act was found unjustified. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12, as the disallowance of reeling and doubling charges under section 40A(2)(b) was deemed unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2017 10:10:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 114 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351845</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2012-13, as the disallowance of interest expenditure proportionate to exempted income under section 14A of the I.T. Act was found unjustified. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12, as the disallowance of reeling and doubling charges under section 40A(2)(b) was deemed unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>