<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 105 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351836</link>
    <description>The tribunal classified Andersons Concentrated Mineral Drops (CMD) and Elete Electrolyte under CTH 2501, and Nanosil under CTH 30045020, rejecting the department&#039;s classification. The tribunal upheld the department&#039;s findings of undervaluation by the appellants and re-determined the import values for CMD and Nanosil. The case was partly allowed regarding the classification of goods and remanded for determining the differential duty liability based on the revised values.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 16:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 105 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351836</link>
      <description>The tribunal classified Andersons Concentrated Mineral Drops (CMD) and Elete Electrolyte under CTH 2501, and Nanosil under CTH 30045020, rejecting the department&#039;s classification. The tribunal upheld the department&#039;s findings of undervaluation by the appellants and re-determined the import values for CMD and Nanosil. The case was partly allowed regarding the classification of goods and remanded for determining the differential duty liability based on the revised values.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>