<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 618 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196478</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the petition, set aside the impugned order, and permitted the complainant to amend the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The Court emphasized the judiciary&#039;s inherent powers to rectify typographical errors for the administration of justice, highlighting the importance of fairness in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2017 10:09:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 618 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196478</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the petition, set aside the impugned order, and permitted the complainant to amend the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The Court emphasized the judiciary&#039;s inherent powers to rectify typographical errors for the administration of justice, highlighting the importance of fairness in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>