https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351828 The High Court of Judiciary at Chennai allowed the appeal under Section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, setting aside the provisional attachment order passed by the Adjudicating Authority. Despite the High Court's quashing of the order, the Adjudicating Authority confirmed it, highlighting communication gaps. The decision emphasized the Authority's duty to respect higher court orders. The attached property was released to the appellant, aiming to ensure compliance with court judgments and prevent such discrepancies in the future. en-us Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Dec 2017 10:09:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351828 The High Court of Judiciary at Chennai allowed the appeal under Section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, setting aside the provisional attachment order passed by the Adjudicating Authority. Despite the High Court's quashing of the order, the Adjudicating Authority confirmed it, highlighting communication gaps. The decision emphasized the Authority's duty to respect higher court orders. The attached property was released to the appellant, aiming to ensure compliance with court judgments and prevent such discrepancies in the future. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351828