https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351826 Section 4C of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act required appointment of officers of Superintendent rank and above on the recommendation of a committee with consultation of the Director, CBI. The selection committee considered the confidential note, discussed the matter with the Director, and recorded reasons for accepting the recommendation. As no verified material established the identity allegation and no substantiated record displaced the CBI's proposal, consultation was treated as part of the committee's deliberative process and not as a veto in favour of the Director. Judicial review was confined to the legality of the consultation process, not the merits of the committee's assessment, and the appointment was held not vitiated. en-us Tue, 28 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Dec 2017 10:09:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351826 Section 4C of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act required appointment of officers of Superintendent rank and above on the recommendation of a committee with consultation of the Director, CBI. The selection committee considered the confidential note, discussed the matter with the Director, and recorded reasons for accepting the recommendation. As no verified material established the identity allegation and no substantiated record displaced the CBI's proposal, consultation was treated as part of the committee's deliberative process and not as a veto in favour of the Director. Judicial review was confined to the legality of the consultation process, not the merits of the committee's assessment, and the appointment was held not vitiated. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351826