<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 94 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351825</link>
    <description>In a Section 9 petition seeking interim protection in aid of enforcement of a foreign award, the relevant jurisdictional reference is the &quot;Court&quot; under the Explanation to Section 47, not the definition in Section 2(1)(e). The amended scheme of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, especially the proviso to Section 2(2), extends interim relief to foreign-seated international commercial arbitrations where the award is enforceable in India. The distinction between the subject matter of the arbitration and the subject matter of the award is material, because enforcement becomes the operative focus after the award is made. Jurisdiction was therefore upheld and the territorial objection failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2017 10:09:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 94 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351825</link>
      <description>In a Section 9 petition seeking interim protection in aid of enforcement of a foreign award, the relevant jurisdictional reference is the &quot;Court&quot; under the Explanation to Section 47, not the definition in Section 2(1)(e). The amended scheme of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, especially the proviso to Section 2(2), extends interim relief to foreign-seated international commercial arbitrations where the award is enforceable in India. The distinction between the subject matter of the arbitration and the subject matter of the award is material, because enforcement becomes the operative focus after the award is made. Jurisdiction was therefore upheld and the territorial objection failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>