<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 93 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351824</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the denial of Cenvat credit on supplementary invoices by the sister unit. Relying on legal precedents, including the Indian Oil Corporation Limited case, the Tribunal emphasized that without proven fraud or suppression of facts, denial of credit was unjustified. The decision highlighted that settlement proceedings without established fraud did not warrant denial of credit, emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence before rejecting Cenvat credit based on supplementary invoices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 12:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 93 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351824</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the denial of Cenvat credit on supplementary invoices by the sister unit. Relying on legal precedents, including the Indian Oil Corporation Limited case, the Tribunal emphasized that without proven fraud or suppression of facts, denial of credit was unjustified. The decision highlighted that settlement proceedings without established fraud did not warrant denial of credit, emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence before rejecting Cenvat credit based on supplementary invoices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>