<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 92 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351823</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal against the disputed suo moto credit taken by them. The decision was based on legal precedents, including the case of Motorola India Pvt. Limited, supporting the appellant&#039;s right to adjust the excess payment made inadvertently. The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s actions were justified and in line with established legal principles, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and granting of the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 18:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 92 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351823</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal against the disputed suo moto credit taken by them. The decision was based on legal precedents, including the case of Motorola India Pvt. Limited, supporting the appellant&#039;s right to adjust the excess payment made inadvertently. The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s actions were justified and in line with established legal principles, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and granting of the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>