<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 80 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351811</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the remand direction to the Original Authority regarding a duty demand of Rs. 77,61,426, emphasizing that the Original Authority&#039;s examination should be limited to issues raised in the appeal proceedings. The Tribunal applied the doctrine of merger, stating that its decision could only merge on issues examined and decided. As the Revenue&#039;s appeal was solely based on this legal issue, the Tribunal upheld the principle of addressing specific legal grounds raised in appeals without expanding beyond the original dispute, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and disposing of the Cross Objection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2017 10:08:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 80 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351811</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the remand direction to the Original Authority regarding a duty demand of Rs. 77,61,426, emphasizing that the Original Authority&#039;s examination should be limited to issues raised in the appeal proceedings. The Tribunal applied the doctrine of merger, stating that its decision could only merge on issues examined and decided. As the Revenue&#039;s appeal was solely based on this legal issue, the Tribunal upheld the principle of addressing specific legal grounds raised in appeals without expanding beyond the original dispute, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and disposing of the Cross Objection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>