https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351810 The Tribunal upheld the demand for duty and penalties against the main appellant and its Directors for violating the conditions of Notification No. 4/2006 and engaging in clandestine removal of goods. However, penalties imposed on employees and M/s Kamdhenu Cement and its Director were set aside due to lack of evidence establishing their direct involvement in the violations. The judgment stressed the importance of maintaining proper records and providing clear evidence to support claims for concessional duty rates. en-us Fri, 06 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Dec 2017 10:08:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351810 The Tribunal upheld the demand for duty and penalties against the main appellant and its Directors for violating the conditions of Notification No. 4/2006 and engaging in clandestine removal of goods. However, penalties imposed on employees and M/s Kamdhenu Cement and its Director were set aside due to lack of evidence establishing their direct involvement in the violations. The judgment stressed the importance of maintaining proper records and providing clear evidence to support claims for concessional duty rates. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 06 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351810