https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351806 The case involved a dispute over the marketability of armoured cables at an intermediate stage and entitlement to benefit under Notification No.67/95. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the intermediate product was not marketable without the necessary coating. Additionally, the appellant was entitled to benefit under Notification No.67/95 while availing benefits of other notifications, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant with the impugned order set aside and consequential relief granted. en-us Tue, 03 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Dec 2017 10:07:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351806 The case involved a dispute over the marketability of armoured cables at an intermediate stage and entitlement to benefit under Notification No.67/95. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the intermediate product was not marketable without the necessary coating. Additionally, the appellant was entitled to benefit under Notification No.67/95 while availing benefits of other notifications, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant with the impugned order set aside and consequential relief granted. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 03 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351806