<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 1199 - Delhi High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196473</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the learned Company Judge&#039;s order directing the appellant to pay Rs. 3,75,000/- along with 12% interest per annum. The court found no merit in the appellant&#039;s contentions regarding limitation and interest, affirming that the respondent was entitled to the interest as restitution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2017 10:07:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 1199 - Delhi High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196473</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the learned Company Judge&#039;s order directing the appellant to pay Rs. 3,75,000/- along with 12% interest per annum. The court found no merit in the appellant&#039;s contentions regarding limitation and interest, affirming that the respondent was entitled to the interest as restitution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>