https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196472 Where an arbitration clause fixed Singapore as the seat, provided for SIAC arbitration and preserved section 9 while excluding Part I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Singapore law governed the arbitration agreement and allegations of fraud, forgery and misrepresentation were held arbitrable as contractual disputes in personam. The court held that unchallenged jurisdictional awards had attained finality and issue estoppel barred the respondents from reopening those objections in section 9 proceedings. It further held that the section 9 petition was maintainable as an independent request for interim protection, not a disguised enforcement action, and granted protective relief to guard against asset dissipation and preserve the efficacy of the arbitration. en-us Wed, 22 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Dec 2017 10:06:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196472 Where an arbitration clause fixed Singapore as the seat, provided for SIAC arbitration and preserved section 9 while excluding Part I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Singapore law governed the arbitration agreement and allegations of fraud, forgery and misrepresentation were held arbitrable as contractual disputes in personam. The court held that unchallenged jurisdictional awards had attained finality and issue estoppel barred the respondents from reopening those objections in section 9 proceedings. It further held that the section 9 petition was maintainable as an independent request for interim protection, not a disguised enforcement action, and granted protective relief to guard against asset dissipation and preserve the efficacy of the arbitration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 22 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196472