<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1825 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196472</link>
    <description>The court determined that the arbitration agreement is governed by Singapore law, allowing the arbitral tribunal to address fraud allegations. The respondents were estopped from contesting the tribunal&#039;s jurisdictional award, and the Section 9 petition seeking interim measures was deemed maintainable. Interim measures were granted to prevent potential loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2017 10:06:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1825 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196472</link>
      <description>The court determined that the arbitration agreement is governed by Singapore law, allowing the arbitral tribunal to address fraud allegations. The respondents were estopped from contesting the tribunal&#039;s jurisdictional award, and the Section 9 petition seeking interim measures was deemed maintainable. Interim measures were granted to prevent potential loss.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>