<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (7) TMI 244 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196459</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition, upholding the constitutionality of Act 15 of 1978. The Court found the Act aimed to democratize the division of the Cochin royal family&#039;s estate, ensuring equal distribution among family members. It deemed the Act reasonable and not discriminatory, providing a pragmatic solution to partition the estate while emphasizing the Board&#039;s adherence to quasi-judicial standards and judicial review for fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 17:25:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (7) TMI 244 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196459</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition, upholding the constitutionality of Act 15 of 1978. The Court found the Act aimed to democratize the division of the Cochin royal family&#039;s estate, ensuring equal distribution among family members. It deemed the Act reasonable and not discriminatory, providing a pragmatic solution to partition the estate while emphasizing the Board&#039;s adherence to quasi-judicial standards and judicial review for fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>