<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 14 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10815</link>
    <description>The High Court of Kerala determined that part of the studio building owned by the partnership firm engaged in cinematograph film production qualified as a plant, entitling the assessee to depreciation at rates applicable to plant and machinery. The court emphasized the functional test, highlighting the studio&#039;s adaptability for creating different scenes and settings as a business tool. By analyzing relevant precedents and legal principles, the court clarified the distinction between a building and a plant, emphasizing the enduring utility and business use of the asset. The judgment favored the assessee, recognizing the studio as a plant eligible for specific deductions and allowances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 13:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 14 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10815</link>
      <description>The High Court of Kerala determined that part of the studio building owned by the partnership firm engaged in cinematograph film production qualified as a plant, entitling the assessee to depreciation at rates applicable to plant and machinery. The court emphasized the functional test, highlighting the studio&#039;s adaptability for creating different scenes and settings as a business tool. By analyzing relevant precedents and legal principles, the court clarified the distinction between a building and a plant, emphasizing the enduring utility and business use of the asset. The judgment favored the assessee, recognizing the studio as a plant eligible for specific deductions and allowances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>