<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (7) TMI 403 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196456</link>
    <description>The court found the petitioner entitled to interest at 12% per annum on delayed arrears of salary, specifying calculation periods. The petitioner&#039;s claim for confirmation as a clerk from the date juniors were confirmed was dismissed. The denial of promotion to the post of Assistant was upheld based on the Departmental Promotion Committee&#039;s decision. Pending T.A. Bills were assured to be processed and paid within a month. The court stressed prompt implementation of its decisions and directed the State Government to ensure compliance. The writ petition was disposed of with specified directions and acknowledgment of the amicus curiae&#039;s assistance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 11:23:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (7) TMI 403 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196456</link>
      <description>The court found the petitioner entitled to interest at 12% per annum on delayed arrears of salary, specifying calculation periods. The petitioner&#039;s claim for confirmation as a clerk from the date juniors were confirmed was dismissed. The denial of promotion to the post of Assistant was upheld based on the Departmental Promotion Committee&#039;s decision. Pending T.A. Bills were assured to be processed and paid within a month. The court stressed prompt implementation of its decisions and directed the State Government to ensure compliance. The writ petition was disposed of with specified directions and acknowledgment of the amicus curiae&#039;s assistance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>