https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196455 Wilful disobedience of clear court orders to pay salary and permit unhindered performance of duties was found to constitute contempt, because the respondents understood the orders yet chose not to comply and an appeal without a stay did not suspend obedience. The apology tendered after prolonged resistance and after the proceedings had advanced was rejected as lacking genuine remorse and appearing aimed at avoiding punishment. An unsupported allegation that the court's order had been wrongly transcribed by the stenographer was also held to lower the dignity and authority of the court and itself amounted to contempt. en-us Wed, 18 Jan 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Dec 2017 11:15:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196455 Wilful disobedience of clear court orders to pay salary and permit unhindered performance of duties was found to constitute contempt, because the respondents understood the orders yet chose not to comply and an appeal without a stay did not suspend obedience. The apology tendered after prolonged resistance and after the proceedings had advanced was rejected as lacking genuine remorse and appearing aimed at avoiding punishment. An unsupported allegation that the court's order had been wrongly transcribed by the stenographer was also held to lower the dignity and authority of the court and itself amounted to contempt. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Jan 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196455