https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196454 Admission regulations for medical, technical and dental courses were treated as binding delegated legislation with statutory force, and the common entrance test was held mandatory in a State with more than one examining board to ensure a uniform merit standard and avoid discrimination. An executive Government Order could not override those regulations or let the State depart from an occupied field without legislative sanction, so the abolition of the common entrance test was invalid and contrary to Article 14. The discontinuance of the improvement examination was treated as a permissible policy change, however, because it did not conflict with any statutory provision; its operation for the current year was protected, with prospective effect from the next academic year. en-us Mon, 27 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Dec 2017 11:06:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196454 Admission regulations for medical, technical and dental courses were treated as binding delegated legislation with statutory force, and the common entrance test was held mandatory in a State with more than one examining board to ensure a uniform merit standard and avoid discrimination. An executive Government Order could not override those regulations or let the State depart from an occupied field without legislative sanction, so the abolition of the common entrance test was invalid and contrary to Article 14. The discontinuance of the improvement examination was treated as a permissible policy change, however, because it did not conflict with any statutory provision; its operation for the current year was protected, with prospective effect from the next academic year. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 27 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196454