<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 66 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351797</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the addition of Rs. 8,67,87,925 in a search assessment for M/s Gee Ispat Group of companies under the Income Tax Act. The court upheld the deletion of the amount, ruling that no substantial legal question arose as the issues primarily involved factual assessments rather than legal interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 08:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 66 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351797</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the addition of Rs. 8,67,87,925 in a search assessment for M/s Gee Ispat Group of companies under the Income Tax Act. The court upheld the deletion of the amount, ruling that no substantial legal question arose as the issues primarily involved factual assessments rather than legal interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>