<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 63 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351794</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision to add income under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act. The Court found that the deposited amount was part of a business arrangement involving other individuals, not belonging to the appellant. Emphasizing the burden of proof on the department to establish the source of funds, the Court ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the department to assess the other individuals independently.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 08:41:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 63 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351794</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision to add income under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act. The Court found that the deposited amount was part of a business arrangement involving other individuals, not belonging to the appellant. Emphasizing the burden of proof on the department to establish the source of funds, the Court ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the department to assess the other individuals independently.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>