<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 59 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351790</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by M/s Gaonkar Mines, affirming the Chief Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s decision to refuse waiver of interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court held that the petitioner&#039;s awareness of the consequences of non-deduction/remittance of tax on contract payments made the levy of interest automatic. Despite the petitioner&#039;s arguments regarding the pending adjudication of disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) and the non-taxability of payments to contractors, the Court found no error in the CCIT&#039;s decision, which was deemed consistent with CBDT Instructions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 08:41:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 59 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351790</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by M/s Gaonkar Mines, affirming the Chief Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s decision to refuse waiver of interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court held that the petitioner&#039;s awareness of the consequences of non-deduction/remittance of tax on contract payments made the levy of interest automatic. Despite the petitioner&#039;s arguments regarding the pending adjudication of disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) and the non-taxability of payments to contractors, the Court found no error in the CCIT&#039;s decision, which was deemed consistent with CBDT Instructions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>