<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 57 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351788</link>
    <description>The Court quashed the order transferring all assessment cases from Bengaluru to Belagavi due to insufficient justification provided by the Principal Commissioner. Emphasizing the convenience of the assessees primarily located in Bengaluru, the Court directed the transfer of all 15 assessment cases back to Bengaluru for completion. The Court allowed the assessing authority in Bengaluru to continue proceedings and issue fresh notices to the assessees, instructing them not to raise objections regarding the expiration of limitation. The judgment underscored the importance of proper reasoning in administrative decisions affecting taxpayers and upheld the petitioners&#039; request for assessments to be centralized in Bengaluru.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 08:34:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 57 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351788</link>
      <description>The Court quashed the order transferring all assessment cases from Bengaluru to Belagavi due to insufficient justification provided by the Principal Commissioner. Emphasizing the convenience of the assessees primarily located in Bengaluru, the Court directed the transfer of all 15 assessment cases back to Bengaluru for completion. The Court allowed the assessing authority in Bengaluru to continue proceedings and issue fresh notices to the assessees, instructing them not to raise objections regarding the expiration of limitation. The judgment underscored the importance of proper reasoning in administrative decisions affecting taxpayers and upheld the petitioners&#039; request for assessments to be centralized in Bengaluru.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>