<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 54 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351785</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the assessment order made under section 147 due to the failure to communicate reasons for reopening the assessment. The Tribunal did not address the merits of the additions made by the AO, as the primary issue of reassessment validity took precedence in the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 08:34:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 54 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351785</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the assessment order made under section 147 due to the failure to communicate reasons for reopening the assessment. The Tribunal did not address the merits of the additions made by the AO, as the primary issue of reassessment validity took precedence in the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>