<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 46 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351777</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the orders passed under Section 263 for both assessment years, holding that the Principal CIT was not correct in law in exercising jurisdiction under Section 263. The appeals filed by the assessee were allowed. The Tribunal emphasized that the AO had made adequate inquiries, and the Principal CIT&#039;s direction for a fresh assessment was not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 08:30:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 46 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351777</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the orders passed under Section 263 for both assessment years, holding that the Principal CIT was not correct in law in exercising jurisdiction under Section 263. The appeals filed by the assessee were allowed. The Tribunal emphasized that the AO had made adequate inquiries, and the Principal CIT&#039;s direction for a fresh assessment was not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>