https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351772 The Tribunal confirmed the addition of Rs. 87,10,800 in the firm's hands for unexplained gold jewelry, while deleting the additions in the individuals' hands to avoid double taxation. The Revenue's appeals were dismissed, and the firm's appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld a protective addition in the firm's hands but rejected a higher addition. The order was pronounced on September 20, 2017. en-us Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Dec 2017 08:30:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351772 The Tribunal confirmed the addition of Rs. 87,10,800 in the firm's hands for unexplained gold jewelry, while deleting the additions in the individuals' hands to avoid double taxation. The Revenue's appeals were dismissed, and the firm's appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld a protective addition in the firm's hands but rejected a higher addition. The order was pronounced on September 20, 2017. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351772