<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 40 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351771</link>
    <description>Cancellation and settlement of import contracts gave rise to a business loss, not a speculative loss under section 43(5), because the assessee failed to honour contractual obligations and paid damages or indemnification for breach. The transactions were not settled through trading without delivery or through futures or options dealings. Where parties settle only the quantum of compensation after breach, the payment is treated as damages for contractual default rather than a speculative settlement. On the facts, no sale had taken place and the amount was paid solely to compensate the other contracting parties, so the loss was allowable as a business loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 14:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 40 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351771</link>
      <description>Cancellation and settlement of import contracts gave rise to a business loss, not a speculative loss under section 43(5), because the assessee failed to honour contractual obligations and paid damages or indemnification for breach. The transactions were not settled through trading without delivery or through futures or options dealings. Where parties settle only the quantum of compensation after breach, the payment is treated as damages for contractual default rather than a speculative settlement. On the facts, no sale had taken place and the amount was paid solely to compensate the other contracting parties, so the loss was allowable as a business loss.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>