<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 40 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351771</link>
    <description>The High Court confirmed that the loss incurred by the assessee was not speculative but resulted from damages due to breach of contract with foreign parties. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, emphasizing the genuineness of the loss and the necessity to pay damages to avoid litigation and maintain business reputation. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the Tribunal&#039;s order was pronounced on May 11, 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 14:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 40 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351771</link>
      <description>The High Court confirmed that the loss incurred by the assessee was not speculative but resulted from damages due to breach of contract with foreign parties. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, emphasizing the genuineness of the loss and the necessity to pay damages to avoid litigation and maintain business reputation. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the Tribunal&#039;s order was pronounced on May 11, 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>