<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 32 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351763</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI partially allowed the appeal regarding the import of &quot;Used Monitors and used Computer parts&quot; without a valid license. While upholding the value enhancement decision, the Tribunal reduced the redemption fine to &amp;amp;8377; 2,50,000 and the penalty to &amp;amp;8377; 1,50,000, finding the original amounts excessive. The decision aimed to balance financial burden and uphold consequences of mis-description and licensing non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 08:09:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 32 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351763</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI partially allowed the appeal regarding the import of &quot;Used Monitors and used Computer parts&quot; without a valid license. While upholding the value enhancement decision, the Tribunal reduced the redemption fine to &amp;amp;8377; 2,50,000 and the penalty to &amp;amp;8377; 1,50,000, finding the original amounts excessive. The decision aimed to balance financial burden and uphold consequences of mis-description and licensing non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>