https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351758 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the original authority's decision on the eligibility of Cenvat credit for trading activities, the application of Rule 6(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, the imposition of penalties, and the question of limitation. The judgment emphasized the significance of the rule clarification in determining the eligibility of credit for activities not explicitly covered under the Cenvat scheme. en-us Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Apr 2018 12:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351758 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the original authority's decision on the eligibility of Cenvat credit for trading activities, the application of Rule 6(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, the imposition of penalties, and the question of limitation. The judgment emphasized the significance of the rule clarification in determining the eligibility of credit for activities not explicitly covered under the Cenvat scheme. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351758