<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 23 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351754</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order confirming a service tax liability and denial of cenvat credit. They ruled that certain activities were not taxable under &quot;Business Auxiliary Service&quot; and that services to Health Authorities or State Government for public health campaigns were exempt. The Tribunal found flaws in tax calculations and ordered a fresh decision, allowing the appellant to present their case again. The appeal was allowed by remand, keeping all issues open for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 07:43:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 23 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351754</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order confirming a service tax liability and denial of cenvat credit. They ruled that certain activities were not taxable under &quot;Business Auxiliary Service&quot; and that services to Health Authorities or State Government for public health campaigns were exempt. The Tribunal found flaws in tax calculations and ordered a fresh decision, allowing the appellant to present their case again. The appeal was allowed by remand, keeping all issues open for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>