https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351752 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order upholding the service tax demand. It remanded the matter for fresh adjudication within the normal limitation period, emphasizing the lack of intent to defraud the government revenue by the appellant. The decision focused on quantifying the demand within the prescribed time limit and ensuring a personal hearing before reaching a new decision. The Tribunal's judgment centered on time limitation, absence of fraudulent intent, and the need for a reevaluation based on compliance and lack of misstatement in tax payment. en-us Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Dec 2017 07:43:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351752 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order upholding the service tax demand. It remanded the matter for fresh adjudication within the normal limitation period, emphasizing the lack of intent to defraud the government revenue by the appellant. The decision focused on quantifying the demand within the prescribed time limit and ensuring a personal hearing before reaching a new decision. The Tribunal's judgment centered on time limitation, absence of fraudulent intent, and the need for a reevaluation based on compliance and lack of misstatement in tax payment. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351752