<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 18 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351749</link>
    <description>The Tribunal examined whether the appellants were liable to pay service tax on brokerage received for Government bond sales. Considering precedents and legal principles, the Tribunal concluded that the demand for service tax was unsustainable due to the sovereign nature of the transactions. Relying on previous judgments and specific notifications, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and providing consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 14:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 18 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351749</link>
      <description>The Tribunal examined whether the appellants were liable to pay service tax on brokerage received for Government bond sales. Considering precedents and legal principles, the Tribunal concluded that the demand for service tax was unsustainable due to the sovereign nature of the transactions. Relying on previous judgments and specific notifications, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and providing consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>