<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 3 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351734</link>
    <description>An assessment passed without granting a requested personal hearing is vulnerable for breach of natural justice, as the taxpayer is denied a fair opportunity to meet proposed additions. The turnover dispute also required reconsideration because the assessing authority had not properly examined whether turnover under the Central Sales Tax regime could be clubbed with taxable turnover under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 for crossing the threshold and whether the returns were belated for interest purposes. The matter was therefore remitted for fresh adjudication after hearing the taxpayer, leaving the merits of the turnover computation and interest levy open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 07:31:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 3 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351734</link>
      <description>An assessment passed without granting a requested personal hearing is vulnerable for breach of natural justice, as the taxpayer is denied a fair opportunity to meet proposed additions. The turnover dispute also required reconsideration because the assessing authority had not properly examined whether turnover under the Central Sales Tax regime could be clubbed with taxable turnover under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 for crossing the threshold and whether the returns were belated for interest purposes. The matter was therefore remitted for fresh adjudication after hearing the taxpayer, leaving the merits of the turnover computation and interest levy open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>