<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 2 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351733</link>
    <description>Export sales of manufactured goods are not covered by the expression in Section 3(4) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, so additional tax cannot be levied on raw materials purchased at concessional rate under Section 3(3). The text reads Section 3(4) with the statutory definition of sale and Explanation 3(a), but confirms that export sales cannot be stretched into the additional levy provision. It also notes that applying Section 3(4) to export sales would conflict with the constitutional prohibition against taxing export sales. The revision therefore failed, and the Tribunal&#039;s view that export sales lie outside Section 3(4) was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 07:31:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 2 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351733</link>
      <description>Export sales of manufactured goods are not covered by the expression in Section 3(4) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, so additional tax cannot be levied on raw materials purchased at concessional rate under Section 3(3). The text reads Section 3(4) with the statutory definition of sale and Explanation 3(a), but confirms that export sales cannot be stretched into the additional levy provision. It also notes that applying Section 3(4) to export sales would conflict with the constitutional prohibition against taxing export sales. The revision therefore failed, and the Tribunal&#039;s view that export sales lie outside Section 3(4) was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=351733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>