<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1392 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196446</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeals, directing the TPO/AO to re-evaluate certain issues based on additional evidence and functional dissimilarity of comparables. The tribunal also ordered the exclusion of certain companies from the list of comparables and addressed the issue of levying interest as consequential.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 07:29:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1392 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196446</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeals, directing the TPO/AO to re-evaluate certain issues based on additional evidence and functional dissimilarity of comparables. The tribunal also ordered the exclusion of certain companies from the list of comparables and addressed the issue of levying interest as consequential.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>