<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1605 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196453</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the rejection of a declaration under VCES, 2013 was dismissed by the Tribunal on limitation grounds. The Tribunal held that as there was no appellate remedy available in the scheme, the appeal was not maintainable and was therefore dismissed. The Chief Commissioner was directed to review cases involving false declarations under Section 111 of VCES, 2013 for necessary action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1605 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196453</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the rejection of a declaration under VCES, 2013 was dismissed by the Tribunal on limitation grounds. The Tribunal held that as there was no appellate remedy available in the scheme, the appeal was not maintainable and was therefore dismissed. The Chief Commissioner was directed to review cases involving false declarations under Section 111 of VCES, 2013 for necessary action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>