<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 1000 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196441</link>
    <description>The second proviso to Section 18(1) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, requires a pre-deposit as a condition for entertaining an appeal. The stated legal position is that a statutory right of appeal can be regulated by reasonable conditions, and a deposit of fifty per cent of the amount due, reducible to not less than twenty-five per cent for recorded reasons, is not discriminatory or violative of Article 14. The condition is presented as a measure to deter frivolous appeals and does not make the appellate remedy illusory, especially since the deposited amount remains refundable to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 18:32:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=498212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 1000 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196441</link>
      <description>The second proviso to Section 18(1) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, requires a pre-deposit as a condition for entertaining an appeal. The stated legal position is that a statutory right of appeal can be regulated by reasonable conditions, and a deposit of fifty per cent of the amount due, reducible to not less than twenty-five per cent for recorded reasons, is not discriminatory or violative of Article 14. The condition is presented as a measure to deter frivolous appeals and does not make the appellate remedy illusory, especially since the deposited amount remains refundable to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>