https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196440 The High Court upheld the validity of the proviso to Section 18(1) of the Securitisation Act, emphasizing the statutory nature of the right to appeal and the Legislature's authority to impose conditions for its exercise. The Court dismissed the petition challenging the proviso's validity under Article 14 of the Constitution, citing legal precedents supporting similar pre-deposit requirements for appeals and reinforcing the legality of such provisions. en-us Wed, 14 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Nov 2017 18:25:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196440 The High Court upheld the validity of the proviso to Section 18(1) of the Securitisation Act, emphasizing the statutory nature of the right to appeal and the Legislature's authority to impose conditions for its exercise. The Court dismissed the petition challenging the proviso's validity under Article 14 of the Constitution, citing legal precedents supporting similar pre-deposit requirements for appeals and reinforcing the legality of such provisions. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 14 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196440