https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196437 In a conspiracy prosecution, acts, writings and statements of co-conspirators are admissible against other accused only while the conspiracy is on foot and in furtherance of the common design; later conduct cannot be treated as proof of the conspiracy itself. Later transactions may still be relevant where they directly show the sham character of earlier dealings and the individual accused's guilty intention. The Court also found no material prejudice from the evidentiary and charge objections raised, and held that the evidence as a whole supported the convictions, which were left undisturbed. en-us Thu, 23 May 1957 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Nov 2017 17:06:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196437 In a conspiracy prosecution, acts, writings and statements of co-conspirators are admissible against other accused only while the conspiracy is on foot and in furtherance of the common design; later conduct cannot be treated as proof of the conspiracy itself. Later transactions may still be relevant where they directly show the sham character of earlier dealings and the individual accused's guilty intention. The Court also found no material prejudice from the evidentiary and charge objections raised, and held that the evidence as a whole supported the convictions, which were left undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 May 1957 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196437